spacer spacer spacer
spacer
September 09, 2010 | |
NavLeft NavRight
spacer
spacer

 

spacer
spacer
ss

 

 

Criminal Justice

While much of our criminal justice system reflects appropriate concern for the safety and welfare of the
Commonwealth’s residents, it falls short on appropriate displays of compassion and mercy. This is particularly the case with how we rehabilitate and re-engage persons convicted of felony crimes, and our continued acceptance of state-sanctioned killing as just.

 

Restoration of Rights

The right to vote forms the core of American democracy. In Virginia, individuals with felony convictions
are barred from voting, even after completing their sentence. The process to regain this fundamental right is so outdated and logistically cumbersome that felony disenfranchisement is a de facto permanent
condition. What’s more, felony disenfranchisement has at its root Jim Crow era laws adopted in the 1902 Virginia Constitutional Convention aimed at preventing African-Americans from voting and circumventing the XVth amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Under existing law, only the Governor has the authority to restore the right to vote through the power of
Executive Clemency, and the petition process is arduous, expensive, and presents significant logistical hurdles for those impacted, the majority of who are non-violent offenders. We believe the petition process is outdated and unfair. Working in coalition and with the Legislative Black Caucus, and directly with former felons and the faith communities that support them, we made significant progress with a bill last session that would give the General Assembly authority over the restoration process.

We will continue this work again this year. In addition, we have been working directly with legislators and interested congregations in developing local outreach and education programs aimed at helping former felons navigate the antiquated system because we believe, as did our forefathers, that “The right of
citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” (U.S. Constitution, Amendment XV, ratified Feb. 3, 1870) 

The Death Penalty

When it comes to the death penalty, Virginia is ranked second, behind Texas, in the number of executions since 1976. While persons guilty of crimes should be punished, flaws in our criminal justice system render the death penalty so unredeemably imperfect that its continued acceptance in Virginia is a stain on our sense of fairness and justice. In addition, the death penalty, with its exhaustive appeals process and unique incarceration requirements, ranks among the most expensive components of our criminal justice system, an area of public spending that grows with every newly designated capital crime. We are focused on ending the death penalty in the state. In addition, during the General Assembly session, we will monitor and work for the defeat of bills that seek to expand application of the death penalty to new crimes.

spacer
PrintPrint  

Member Login

Login to our
Advocacy Action Center
for the latest action alerts on pending legislation, issue briefs and other opportunities!

Click here

Not yet a member?

Sign up.

spacer

Track Our Bills

Richmond Sunlight

Sunlight Tags for
Criminal Justice-related bills:

Restoration, Death Penalty

spacer

Read Our Brief

spacer
email emaildigg diggfacebook facebooktwitter twitter
spacer
spacer

Contact Us

Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy
office@virginiainterfaithcenter.org
1716 East Franklin Street
Richmond, VA 23223
804.643.2474

 

spacer

Our Vision and Mission

The Virginia Interfaith Center empowers Virginians to create social justice for all by advocating for systemic change. We envision a world where people of all faiths cooperate to create compassionate communities that are just, peaceful, equitable and sustainable. 

spacer
Search this Site
  Search
Home | About | Issues | Support | News Room | Blog | Speakers
Copyright 2009 by Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy | Privacy | Legal
spacer